# Implementation Roadmap ## Purpose This document is the handoff-oriented implementation plan for the project. It is intentionally short and execution-focused. A new agent should be able to read this file, understand the current project state, and immediately know what to build next without re-deriving the whole design. ## Current Status As of now: - architecture and workflow docs are written - CLI surfaces for `inbox`, `orch`, worktree execution, and `council-review` are defined - embedded SQLite schema and migrations exist in code - JSON output shapes are defined for the major flows - Go module and initial command skeletons exist - `inbox` and `orch` both compile - shared SQLite schema initialization exists - `inbox` is implemented end-to-end, including send/fetch/claim/renew/update/reply/done/fail/cancel/list/show/watch/wait-reply - `inbox` supports blocking waits, lease renewal, unread fetches backed by per-agent read cursors, `--body-file`, artifact attachments, and structured JSON errors with stable exit codes - integration tests now cover each implemented inbox command, plus the main inbox workflows, wait/watch flows, artifact persistence, unread behavior, and JSON error contracts - a human-readable inbox command test-plan set has been authored under `docs/tests/inbox/` - a reusable Codex skill package for `inbox` now exists under `skills/inbox/`, with a formal `SKILL.md`, `agents/openai.yaml`, and a bundled CLI binary asset - an inbox skill forward-test plan directory now exists under `docs/tests/inbox-skill/`, with a shared execution template and multiple scenario cases - `orch` currently exists as a command skeleton only - no scheduler workflows have been implemented yet This means the project is past design discovery and ready for `orch` implementation. ## Source Of Truth Read these docs first: - [architecture.md](/home/kurihada/project/ai-workflow-skill/docs/architecture.md) - [inbox-cli.md](/home/kurihada/project/ai-workflow-skill/docs/inbox-cli.md) - [orch-cli.md](/home/kurihada/project/ai-workflow-skill/docs/orch-cli.md) - [worktree-execution.md](/home/kurihada/project/ai-workflow-skill/docs/worktree-execution.md) - [council-review.md](/home/kurihada/project/ai-workflow-skill/docs/council-review.md) Use this roadmap for implementation order, not for protocol design. ## Project Goal Build a Go-based local agent orchestration stack with: - `inbox`: worker-facing durable coordination bus - `orch`: leader-facing scheduler and control plane - strict worktree-backed execution for code-writing task attempts - `council-review`: a user-facing three-reviewer brainstorm workflow implemented on top of `orch` ## Implementation Principles - Do not redesign the protocol unless implementation reveals a real contradiction. - Keep `inbox` and `orch` as separate CLIs or command groups, but share one SQLite file. - Prefer one small working path over broad unfinished scaffolding. - Make JSON output stable early. - Implement the happy path first, then add wait/retry/cleanup. ## Recommended v1 Order ## Progress Snapshot Current implementation status: - `Milestone 1: Go Skeleton` is complete - `Milestone 2: Shared DB Layer` is complete enough for both CLIs - `Milestone 3: Inbox Happy Path` is complete - `Milestone 6: Waiting Primitives` is partially complete through `inbox wait-reply` The next practical coding target is `Milestone 4: Orch Core Scheduling`. ### Milestone 1: Go Skeleton Goal: - initialize the Go module - choose CLI framework and SQLite driver - create package layout - make empty commands compile Recommended shape: - `cmd/inbox` - `cmd/orch` - `internal/db` - `internal/store` - `internal/protocol` - `internal/cli` Definition of done: - `go build ./...` succeeds - `inbox --help` works - `orch --help` works Status: - completed ### Milestone 2: Shared DB Layer Goal: - create the SQLite connection layer - enable required pragmas - add schema initialization and migration mechanism Minimum scope: - communication tables for `inbox` - scheduling tables for `orch` - shared `events` table Definition of done: - `inbox init` initializes the database - `orch` can open the same database successfully Status: - completed for current inbox needs Completed so far: - shared DB open layer exists - required SQLite pragmas are applied - embedded schema files exist - `inbox init` applies schema successfully Remaining: - decide whether `orch` should gain an explicit DB bootstrap check or continue to rely on `inbox init` ### Milestone 3: Inbox Happy Path Goal: - implement worker-facing coordination primitives first First commands: - `inbox init` - `inbox send` - `inbox fetch` - `inbox claim` - `inbox update` - `inbox reply` - `inbox done` - `inbox fail` - `inbox show` Delay if needed: - `watch` - `wait-reply` - `cancel` - `list` Definition of done: - one thread can be created, claimed, updated, replied to, and completed - all major commands support `--json` Status: - completed Completed so far: - `inbox init` - `inbox send` - `inbox fetch` - `inbox claim` - `inbox renew` - `inbox update` - `inbox reply` - `inbox done` - `inbox fail` - `inbox cancel` - `inbox list` - `inbox show` - `inbox watch` - `inbox wait-reply` ### Milestone 4: Orch Core Scheduling Goal: - implement run/task/dependency/attempt orchestration on top of `inbox` First commands: - `orch run init` - `orch task add` - `orch dep add` - `orch ready` - `orch dispatch` - `orch reconcile` - `orch blocked` - `orch answer` - `orch status` Delay if needed: - `retry` - `reassign` - `cancel` - `cleanup` - `wait` Definition of done: - a leader can create a run - add tasks and dependencies - dispatch a task through `orch` - see worker state reflected back after `reconcile` ### Milestone 5: Strict Worktree Support Goal: - ensure code-writing tasks execute in isolated worktrees First scope: - `orch dispatch` resolves `base_ref` - strict mode fails when the repo is dirty and no explicit base is provided - worktree path and branch name are stored on the attempt Definition of done: - a code task dispatch creates a real worktree - the assigned worktree path appears in attempt metadata and inbox payload ### Milestone 6: Waiting Primitives Goal: - replace blind polling with blocking CLI waits Commands: - `orch wait` - `inbox wait-reply` Definition of done: - leader can block on new task events - blocked worker can block on reply events ### Milestone 7: Council Review Goal: - implement the user-facing three-reviewer brainstorming workflow First commands: - `orch council start` - `orch council wait` - `orch council tally` - `orch council report` Definition of done: - one council run can dispatch three reviewers - tally grouped recommendations into `consensus`, `majority`, and `minority` - produce stable JSON and a markdown report artifact ## Immediate Next Task If a new agent is taking over now, the next concrete step should be: 1. start `Milestone 4: Orch Core Scheduling` 2. keep the authored inbox test-plan set in `docs/tests/inbox/` synchronized if CLI behavior changes during `orch` work The inbox implementation and its human-readable test-plan set are already in place, so the next meaningful project step is to build scheduler behavior on top of that stable base. ## Recommended Driver Choices Current recommendation: - CLI framework: `Cobra` - SQLite driver: pure-Go driver Reason: - command surfaces are already command-group heavy - pure-Go SQLite keeps distribution simpler ## Suggested Early Tests Completed so far: - schema init test - inbox command-level CLI integration coverage aligned to `docs/tests/inbox/` - inbox workflow lifecycle coverage Still recommended before the codebase grows too much: - single-task orch dispatch and reconcile test - worktree path generation test - council tally grouping test ## Inbox Test Documentation Roadmap Status: - completed for the current inbox CLI surface - command-level and workflow Markdown documents exist under `docs/tests/inbox/` - future updates should revise this section only when new inbox commands or materially new CLI-visible behavior are added Goal: - make inbox behavior easy for a new agent to understand and convert into automated tests without re-reading all code paths Directory layout: - `docs/tests/inbox/README.md` - `docs/tests/inbox/_shared/README.md` - `docs/tests/inbox/workflows/README.md` - `docs/tests/inbox//README.md` - `docs/tests/inbox//.md` Initial command folders: - `init` - `send` - `fetch` - `claim` - `renew` - `update` - `reply` - `done` - `fail` - `cancel` - `list` - `show` - `watch` - `wait-reply` Documentation rules: - organize by folder with a `README.md` entrypoint - command folders use `README.md` as an index only - each command case lives in its own Markdown file named after the case slug - do not use numeric test case IDs - identify command cases by concrete file path - keep one command per directory, plus `workflows/` for cross-command behavior - use `_shared/` for common fixtures, database conventions, exit-code rules, and shared JSON assertions Required per-case structure: - `用例意义` - `前置条件` - `输入` - `预期输出` - `断言结论` Case file naming pattern: - `.md` Authoring order: 1. global conventions in `docs/tests/inbox/README.md` 2. shared fixtures and assertion helpers in `docs/tests/inbox/_shared/README.md` 3. lifecycle flow in `docs/tests/inbox/workflows/README.md` 4. core command docs: `send`, `fetch`, `claim`, `reply`, `done`, `show` 5. secondary command docs: `renew`, `update`, `fail`, `cancel`, `list` 6. waiting and read-state docs: `watch`, `wait-reply`, unread and mark-read workflow cases Definition of done: - every implemented inbox command has a dedicated document directory - every documented case contains concrete input and expected output - shared assumptions are centralized instead of copied into each command file - a new agent can pick any case and implement it as an automated test with minimal additional discovery ## Out Of Scope For First Pass Do not block v1 on these: - distributed execution - advanced auth or permissions - patch-producing council mode - configurable reviewer counts beyond three - rich similarity engines for proposal grouping - background daemons beyond blocking CLI commands ## Handoff Notes For Future Agents - The design phase is complete enough to start coding. - Avoid reopening major design questions unless implementation forces it. - The repository already has compiling binaries and working schema init. - The inbox test-plan docs are in place; keep them synchronized before and during broad `orch` implementation. - inbox command test-plan folders use `README.md` as an index plus one file per case; keep any further structural changes consistent with the documented rules above. - Preserve the separation: - `inbox` handles communication - `orch` handles scheduling - `council-review` is a workflow on top of `orch` - When writing inbox test docs, use the folder-per-command structure described above and keep cross-command cases inside `docs/tests/inbox/workflows/`. - Treat this file as the implementation entrypoint for new agents.