# Orch Markdown Test Review

## Status

- `completed`

## Owner

- codex

## Started At

- `2026-03-19`

## Goal

- review the authored `docs/tests/orch/` command directories and case files for completeness against the current `orch` CLI and identify any missing or weakly specified test-plan coverage

## Scope

- inspect each `docs/tests/orch/<leaf-command>/` directory
- compare current Markdown cases against the implemented CLI and existing automated integration tests
- identify missing command-visible contracts, edge cases, or unclear assertions
- summarize findings without expanding scope into unrelated implementation changes

## Checklist

- [x] create an execution roadmap for the review
- [x] inspect current `docs/tests/orch/` files and split the review by command area
- [x] collect findings for core scheduler command directories
- [x] collect findings for interactive leader/control command directories
- [x] collect findings for council command directories
- [x] summarize whether any command directories need supplemental cases or edits
- [x] archive this roadmap with a completion summary

## Files

- `docs/roadmaps/archive/orch-markdown-test-review.md`
- `docs/tests/orch/README.md`
- `docs/tests/orch/ROADMAP.md`
- `docs/tests/orch/<leaf-command>/README.md`
- `docs/tests/orch/<leaf-command>/<case-slug>.md`

## Decisions

- treat this as a review task first: surface gaps before proposing edits

## Blockers

- none

## Next Step

- none; future follow-up should start from the review findings and add only the missing case files or constraints that were called out

## Completion Summary

- completed a read-only coverage review of the authored `docs/tests/orch/` command directories against the current `orch` CLI and automated integration tests
- identified the highest-value missing or weakly specified command-visible cases so follow-up authoring can target concrete gaps instead of re-auditing the whole tree